Flip Flop Mitt?

     Mitt Romney has been attacked for being inconsistent. He proposed what was essentially a prepubescent version of Obamacare in Massachusetts, advocated its application at the federal level, and now has changed his mind and supports "repealing the bad and keeping the good" parts of Obamacare, which he claims is a failure, unlike his very similar plan. He was formerly staunchly pro-abortion and is now allegedly pro-life. One area where he has maintained a relatively high degree of consistency, however, is his support for the agenda of radical homosexual activists. In Massachusetts he overrode the predominantly Democrat legislature--and the Massachusetts constitution--to institute same-sex marriage. He also actively supported events such as "gay pride" parades and provided several other shows of support towards gay activists. Although his position on marriage has changed, his support for the homosexual agenda has not, as evidenced by this article.

     Why should we settle for someone who is willing to concede to radical leftist activists? Sure, Obama is a radical leftist activist himself, but since when did the distasteful nature of one's opponent become a part of one's own qualifications? Tom Hoefling has been consistent in his stand for the traditional, time-tested, and God-given family system. He has stood for what we stand for; we in turn should stand for him.

For a new birth of freedom!