Statistical Analysis Reveals Likely Fraud in Romney Victories

     Analysis from a number of sources, notably here and here, shows a stunning statistical anomaly in the votes collected in the Republican primary. The larger the precinct - regardless of the demographics of the precinct - the more vote flipping, a form of election fraud in which votes are changed from one candidate to another or several others during electronic voting and vote tabulation, in favor of Mitt Romney occurs. The results fall far outside what can reasonably be expected and are nearly impossible statistically speaking. The vote flipping favors Mitt Romney exclusively (and by an enormous margin - a total of 1,233,570 votes were flipped in his favor, while no other candidate gained any votes as a result of vote flipping) and hurts his rivals in amounts proportional to how great of a threat they were. Santorum lost the most, losing 580,291 votes, Gingrich second, losing 499,899 votes, Paul third, losing 69,887, with Perry, Bachmann, and the rest of the field straggling in behind the three leading rivals.

     The same analysis reveals a similar anomaly in the results from the 2008 election, this time in favor of Republican nominee John McCain. This seems to indicate that the problem lies in the Republican Party rather than in a specific candidate. The Republican Party establishment apparently has engaged in systematic election fraud in at least the Republican primaries and the last presidential election. Dishonesty on this level ought to be utterly repulsive to any honest voter. It is time for those within the Republican Party who value honesty to come out and begin to support a party which will value honesty. America's Party, which refuses to accept donations to avoid even the slightest hint of fraud, is the obvious choice.

For a new birth of freedom!

Platform Republicans

     Former Reagan-era diplomat and current World Net Daily commentator Alan Keyes has presented  a strategy for conservatives dissatisfied with the Republican Party's liberal presidential nominee but unwilling to leave the party completely. Those in this category can honor their consciences and refuse to vote for Romney, a liberal, but vote straight Republican (as far as their conscience allows) down the rest of the ticket. This will not only help preserve a pro-life conservative majority in the House while building one in the Senate, the disparity between votes in the presidential race and the votes in other national races will send a clear message that conservatives have had enough of being trampled by the Republican wing of the elitist faction. This approach ultimately demonstrates support for the conservative (albeit imperfect) Republican platform while rejecting Romney, who rejects the Republican platform, hence the term "platform Republican."

     While this approach has much to recommend it, one could imagine an amendment to it which would send an even clearer message to the Republican wing of the elitist faction: while voting straight conservative Republican down the rest of the ticket, vote for Tom Hoefling, who stands for all the good and very few, if any, of the bad aspects of the Republican platform, at the top. Not only would it send the message that conservatives are fed up and tired of "holding our noses" and voting, it would send that message that our country matters more to us than our party, and that principle is more valuable than politics. We do not have to be disenfranchised, we can send a message loud and clear that we believe in something worth fighting for, and we are done compromising it to achieve ephemeral political gain.

For a new birth of freedom!

Republican Congress Funds Obamacare

     Republicans may talk a good talk when it comes to conservatism, but when it comes time for them to walk the walk things get a bit dicey. House Republicans passed a continuing resolution funding Obamacare, including the unpopular HHS mandate, which requires all insurance providers to provide access to sterilization, contraception, and abortifacients free of charge. It also does not restrict funding to Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the country.

     The House of Representatives controls which funds are appropriated and for what. It, as the body which most closely represents the will of the people, stands as the last defense against irresponsible and immoral spending. While the Republicans in the House may have claimed to oppose Obamacare and funding for Planned Parenthood, they could have acted and refused to include those programs in the continuing resolution yet they did not. It is not difficult to see that their true goal is not to advance conservatism and better the country but to dupe a large portion of the electorate. These are the men and women many conservatives claim will keep a "President Romney" in check. How can we expect that they will risk political suicide and stand up to the most powerful figure in their own party when they won't even take the opportunity to excite their base by standing up to the most powerful figure in the opposing party?

     The Republican leadership is corrupt, unprincipled, and concerned only with gaining and holding power and prestige for themselves, yet many well-meaning conservatives will blithely troop to the polls to vote to keep this group of unscrupulous egomaniacs in power, who gladly provide lip service to conservatism but betray at every opportunity. It would be far better if those conservatives would utilize their energy to send the message that their country is more important than their party, and that principle matters more than politics. Vote for a man whose rhetoric supporting America's founding principles has not only been matched but exceeded by his actions in defense of those principles--Tom Hoefling.

For a new birth of freedom!

Republicans: Fewer Fleas

"In the recent debate over increasing the debt ceiling, the Democrats offered a plan to have a hungry eight hundred pound grizzly bear with fleas live in your house. The Republicans offered the bear, minus a few of the fleas. Now they want you to vote for them again because of their wonderful anti-flea credentials. But if you ask them about the bear in the living room, they call you a purist and an extremist." Tom Hoefling

Third Parties in the Age of the RINO

     Many—particularly those who stand to benefit the most from the current two party system—would have you believe that voting third party is essentially a vote for the worst candidate in the race. In essence, they claim that refusing to vote for an unacceptable candidate and support “the lesser of two evils” only benefits the greater evil. If true, this would mean that no conscientious person could ever vote third party. Fortunately, it isn't true.